tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27660174.post8339886728940961252..comments2023-08-13T07:13:45.326-05:00Comments on LK Hunsaker, Thoughts and Sketches: MainstreamLK Hunsakerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10706929624587891992noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27660174.post-92074657763011679782008-08-10T09:44:00.000-05:002008-08-10T09:44:00.000-05:00Yes, mainstream sounds that way, except John Irvin...Yes, mainstream sounds that way, except John Irving is called mainstream by current definition and what I do is similar, with a bit less grit and a bit more romance, but along those lines. I've always wondered at the use of "mainstream" to apply to work that is actually opposite of that. Romance fiction and horror are more actual "mainstream" ie. more widely read. <BR/><BR/>We who understand wordLK Hunsakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10706929624587891992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27660174.post-49215234703942301792008-08-09T21:50:00.000-05:002008-08-09T21:50:00.000-05:00Hello, It was nice meeting you on the square in Me...Hello, <BR/><BR/>It was nice meeting you on the square in Mercer. <BR/><BR/>I had a chance to read your excerpt, and the short story. Both were very interesting. And I know you're wanting me to say more. And I will. <BR/><BR/>But first, visit my blog and read that post, leave a short (or long) comment, and in the meantime I'll lengthen my critique. <BR/><BR/>I think to be called a "mainstream" TChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04005938156720914381noreply@blogger.com